Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0/Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0 (L0pht Heavy Industries, Inc.)(1997).ISO/tezcat/Beter/Beter80

Text File | 1996-07-08 | 51KB | 909 lines

From the Radio Free Michigan archives

ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot

If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to
[e-mail].
------------------------------------------------

This is the Dr. Beter AUDIO LETTER(R), 1629 K St. NW, Washington, D.C.
20006.

   Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is November 3, 1982,
and this is my AUDIO LETTER(R) #80. Beginning with this AUDIO LETTER
I'm making a small shift in my recording schedule from the end of each
month to early in the month. This change will help reduce conflicts
with holidays and other problems during the course of the year.

   For years now a familiar slogan has been used in the advertisements
for a popular pain reliever. The slogan was so effective that it
helped build annual sales of nearly half a billion dollars. The pain
reliever became #1 in America with 37% of the market, and yet for
weeks now this famous slogan has been heard no more. The slogan was:
"Trust Tylenol. Hospitals do."

   Literally over night, just a month ago, Americans by the millions
stopped trusting Tylenol. A number of people in Chicago had suddenly
died after taking Extra-Strength Tylenol capsules. By October 1, six
were dead and a number of others gravely ill. A few days later the
death toll rose to seven. The Tylenol capsules which they had taken
had been contaminated with one of the deadliest of all poisons,
cyanide. Instantly headlines about the Tylenol massacre pushed all
other news stories into the background here in the United States. A
nation-wide alert went out for people to stop taking Tylenol capsules
until further notice. Everyone was told to look for two suspect
batches of Tylenol, identifiable by their serial numbers. The booming
Tylenol capsule production line was shut down. The manufacturer
launched a Tylenol capsule recall program. Many Tylenol products were
withdrawn from drug store shelves, and those that remained were
shunned by frightened customers.

   Thus began a news story which has remained on everyone's tongue for
a solid month. In most cases even the most dramatic news stories begin
to loss their impact after a week or so--but not the Tylenol scare. It
has been nursed along week after week, piece by agonizing piece like a
real-life soap opera.

   First there were worries that the poisoning might have been due to
some horrible production-line accident; then it was found that the
deadly capsules had been poisoned deliberately. After a week or so,
new Tylenol poisoning cases came to light in Oroville, California and
in Philadelphia. Those stories revived fears of a nation-wide
poisoning threat all over again.

   By mid-month the search for the Tylenol killer was closing in on
the Chicago area itself. For another week or so there were sensational
stories day after day about alleged "hot leads" in the case. Gradually
they all fizzled out but only after keeping the story alive a while
longer. By late in October the Tylenol scare was at last beginning to
die down in its impact.

   But the Tylenol massacre was made to order to spawn copycat crimes
by a few unstable individuals here and there. Those copycat crimes
were slow in coming, so the major media were enlisted to help set them
off. Time after time television news reports about the Tylenol tragedy
digressed into discussions in the "What if...?" category. "What if the
poison had been put not in Tylenol but perhaps food or Halloween
candy?" said the television voices. Time after time they pointed out
how easy it would be to do that and get away with it. And sure enough,
suddenly it started happening. Here and there people received eye
burns from adulterated eye drops. A man ended up in hospital after
poisoning by way of a carton of chocolate milk; and Halloween candy
began showing up with poison, needles, and razor blades. What had
started as the Tylenol scare a month ago has become an ever-widening
fear of adulteration of everything we buy for food or health.

   My friends, the Tylenol massacre and all the other fears it has
spawned will fade from our minds eventually, but for now it has done
its job to perfection. That job was to take our attention away from
certain events on the international scene for now and to turn our
attention inward instead. This change was desired by the American
Bolsheviks because of their failure in September to set off NUCLEAR
WAR ONE on schedule!

   For the moment the Bolsheviks here are responding by turning their
energies inward to the domestic scene more intensely than before. As
it stands right now, the Bolshevik-dominated Reagan Administration
expects to emphasize domestic matters for roughly the coming year.
They want to press forward with a quiet new Bolshevik revolution here
in America to tighten their control over you and me. At the same time
they also want to try to finish off their deadly rivals for power--the
Rockefeller cartel. If the Bolsheviks here can succeed in doing these
things, they will be in far better position to try again at nuclear
war.

   At present, my friends, the tentative plans of the Bolsheviks here
call for a new crisis sequence toward nuclear war to begin late in
1983, and culminate in war itself in early 1984! It will take that
long for the military preparations for nuclear war to be recycled up
to peak readiness. Between now and then, you can expect major crises
to erupt overseas which may look like they hold a threat of nuclear
war in themselves; but these interim crises over the next year or so
will actually have a different purpose. They will not be intended to
lead in themselves to nuclear war but to improve America's
geostrategic position. If successful, this process will improve the
Pentagon's chances when it is time for nuclear war itself.

   The process of turning inward by the Bolsheviks here is a temporary
one but very important. It must be understood if you are to understand
many coming events in our economy and in politics. At the same time,
we must also keep our eye on the ball and look beyond the temporary
inward emphasis of the next year or so. And it is time for an
important update about what the Kremlin is doing in response to all
these things.

   My three special topics for this AUDIO LETTER are:

Topic #1--AMERICA'S ECONOMIC DECLINE INTO A NEW DARK AGES Topic
#2--WAR COUNTDOWN TOWARD THE ISRAELI YEAR OF DOOM Topic #3--CHANGING
OF THE GUARD IN THE NEW KREMLIN.

Topic #1:

                  The Stock Market--1980s/1930s

   In recent weeks there's been one seemingly bright spot in the
increasingly grim United States economy. With unemployment climbing,
bankruptcies spreading, and factories idle, the Stock Market alone has
acted cheerful. In August the prospect of dropping interest rates
became the excuse for a dramatic upturn in stock prices. Over the past
2-1/2 months we've seen a series of wild swings on Wall Street that
seem to defy all logic. Records have been set in trading volume on one
day only to be shattered by an even larger record on another day.
Several times recently the one-day jump in the Dow Jones average has
reached record levels. One of those days was October 8, the same day
that it was announced that the official unemployment rate has reached
double digits.

   With unemployment at levels not seen since the Great Depression,
the Stock Market has continued to soar. Three days after the
announcement of double-di git unemployment, the Stock Market passed
the 1000 mark on the Dow Jones industrial averages.

   The situation we are seeing now is described well by an article
released by the Associated Press in August. The article begins in the
words, and I quote:

  "Wall Street, which waited for years for the recession to begin, is
starting to act like the economic downturn is just about over. Even as
companies report that their profits in the second quarter were lower
than last year, the Stock Market has continued a rally that has pushed
up the Dow Jones industrial average to its highest levels in three
years."

My friends, the article from which I just quoted was published in
August, as I said--but not August of this year! It is dated August 3,
1980, over two years ago. At that time the Stock Market appeared to be
saying the same thing it appears to be saying now, that better times
are just ahead; but of course better times were not ahead. The Stock
Market bubble of two years ago burst after a while, while the economy
kept heading downward.

   What is going on in the Stock Market right now is just another
stunt known in some circles as a "Bear Trap." A bear trap is an
episode of gross manipulation of the Stock Market by certain large
institutional investors to unload unwanted stocks. I first described
how a bear trap works in AUDIO LETTER No. 33 when the bear trap took
place in the spring of 1978. Another took place around the late summer
of 1980, producing the article from which I quoted earlier; and now in
the autumn of 1982 we're watching as another Stock Market bear trap
snares its victims.

   During September, and especially October, large amounts of unwanted
stocks were successfully dumped onto small investors. Instead of
setting another new record for a one-day rise in stock prices, the Dow
Jones set a more disturbing record a few days ago. On Monday October
25 the Dow dropped more than 36 points, the largest one-day drop since
the crash of 1929. The excuse given was that suddenly there are signs
that those dropping interest rates just might head up again.

   My friends, the fact is that even a thousand (1000) on the Dow is
worth only about as much as 400 a decade ago due to inflation, and the
wildness of the ups and downs lately are a very ominous sign. They are
a symptom of instability in the Market, meaning a small stimulus
produces big effects. That is what happened to the Stock Market in
1929, too, just before the big crash.

   The United States economy is fundamentally sick, and now it is
having chills and fever as reflected by the Stock Market up-and-down
jumps. The two engines of our economy, automobiles and construction,
are still running at about half speed. In the past I've explained why
a sustained depression in these two areas would inevitably spread to
engulf our whole economy. And now it is happening!

   Unemployment, as measured by the Government's grossly understated
statistics, reached 10.1 per cent in September, the highest since the
Great Depression. Bankruptcies, too, have now reached a pace unequaled
since the Great Depression. Farmers are in a tailspin with projected
farm incomes for 1982 down 24% from 1981.

                    Banking System Situation

   And then there are the banks. The Great Depression of the 1930s
really began not with the 1929 Stock Market crash but with the
collapse of our banking system afterward. Likewise today, it is not
the chills and fever of the Stock Market that are the greatest
economic danger--it is the dangerous condition of our banks.

   When I recorded AUDIO LETTER No. 44 in March 1979, I reported that
the Bolsheviks here in America were going after the banks. The
Bolshevik coup d'etat against their former Rockefeller allies had
begun two months earlier with the murder of Nelson Rockefeller; and by
that March, Bolshevik moles were going to work throughout the
Rockefeller banking empire. As I reported in AUDIO LETTER No. 44, they
were starting at the top with the giant Chase Manhattan Bank. If the
American Bolsheviks can shatter Rockefeller banking power, the
Rockefeller cartel may well be doomed!

   My friends, the process which I first made public in AUDIO LETTER
No. 44 is now far advanced. During the first eight months of this year
27 banks failed here in the United States. Many others are teetering
on the edge, and on August 23 it was announced that five of America's
largest banks are in deep trouble. They are deep in the "red" due to
the inability to collect on huge bad loans. The five banks which were
in the news that day are all members of the Rockefeller group, and one
of them is none other than Chase Manhattan itself.

   The problem of bad loans now plaguing the Rockefeller banks is
destined to just keep getting worse, not better. The final crushing
blow that could bring the Rockefeller banks crashing down is the
mountain of bad loans to foreign countries. Years ago when the
Rockefeller cartel had no rival in governmental power here, those
loans were made without concern. Whenever loans went bad, they always
made sure the American taxpayer bailed them out through various
governmental devices; but now the situation has changed. The
Rockefeller cartel no longer exercises sufficient power over the whole
of the United States Government to bail itself out in this way.
Instead their enemies, the Bolsheviks here, are increasingly able to
block the Rockefeller group.

   This new situation was reflected in the World Economic Conference
of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund two months ago. At
the conference, which was held in Toronto, Canada, the Rockefeller and
Bolshevik factions squared off against one another--and, my friends,
the Bolsheviks won!

   Here is basically what happened: Rockefeller cartel banking
operatives both from America and from abroad argued for increased
quotas for the International Monetary Fund--that is, they argued that
the United States and other developed nations should donate tens of
billions of dollars to cover increased international loans.
Rockefeller spokesmen presented their arguments in terms of the needs
of the Third World nations, but what they were really worried about
was the possible consequences to their own banks of bad loans to the
Third World. Increased IMF quotas from participating nations could
have helped bail them out of trouble. That is what the Rockefeller
group tried to do by enlisting the support of the Third World nations
themselves. But the American Bolsheviks squashed it!

   Speaking in Toronto on September 6, the entity Reagan declared:

  "The United States cannot afford to bail out the world."

What he really meant was that America's Bolshevik government was not
about to bail out the Rockefeller cartel--and with that, increased IMF
quotas were refused.

   So now, my friends, the Rockefeller cartel banking interests face
an untenable situation. They hold vast amounts of loans to Third World
countries, and a lot of it is bunching up and coming due. During 1983
more than half trillion dollars in these loans will be coming due.
About 80 per cent of that could end up going unpaid to the banks by
financially-troubled nations. That would add up to a combined default
of more than four hundred billion dollars ($400,000,000,000). If the
big banks should lose even a fraction of that unthinkable amount, it
will spell disaster for America's entire banking system! Very quickly
the collapse will engulf the entire international banking system as
well.

   As major American banks collapse, credit lines to industry will be
cut off. Unable to finance continued operations, more and more
businesses will close their doors, unemployment will mushroom, and the
depression which we already experience will grow far worse. The public
will clamor for the Government to do something--and do something it
will! There will be reflation of our currency (that is, more inflation
in the depths of depression), and sooner or later the entity President
Reagan or his successor will declare a NATIONAL ECONOMIC
EMERGENCY--shades of FDR and 1933.

   There  is an ironic parallel between all of this and what happened
half a century ago to trigger the Great Depression. In the early 1930s
a major New York bank called the "United States Bank of New York", a
private bank, teetered on the edge of failure. The bank appealed for
help to the Federal Reserve System, which by its charter is supposed
to be the lender of last resort; but the Federal Reserve refused to
come to its aid. The result, which was predictable, was the failure of
the United States Bank. That started a chain reaction due to shared
loan arrangements and other factors which linked that bank to many
others. When the United States Bank failed, it dragged down others,
which dragged down still others. The progressive collapse of much of
America's banking system dragged America's whole economy downward into
the Great Depression--and all because of the deliberate inaction of
the privately-owned Federal Reserve System.

   Today the parallel to all this is taking place at the international
level. This time it is not just one bank but the whole Rockefeller
banking network that is teetering due to bad international loans. So
the bankers have appealed for help through the international analog of
the Federal Reserve System--that is, the IMF. But at the Toronto
Economic Conference the so-called Reagan Administration prevented that
aid from being given. As a result, the whole Rockefeller banking
network is heading toward almost certain disaster; and because the
linkages among banks that existed in the 1930s exist again today, the
whole banking system of America and the world is threatened!

   The irony, my friends, is just this: In the 1930s it was the
Rockefeller interests who helped to bring about the banking system
collapse through their effective control of the Federal Reserve
System. That was how they acquired effective control of American
banking after it was rebuilt, but this time the shoe is on the other
foot! This time it is the Rockefeller bankers themselves who want help
and who face disaster because it has been denied them.

   The United States is leading the world into a new depression even
worse than that of the 1930s, but there is a fundamental difference
between what happened 50 years ago and what is happening now! That
difference has to do with our currency itself.

   In the 30's, times were hard but at least our money was still
stable and valuable. It was tough to earn a dollar; but if you did,
you could buy a lot with it. Today, in the 80's, it's different. The
dollar is no longer stable; its value is shrinking before our very
eyes. While jobs are vanishing and wages are being restrained, even
the dollars we do earn are losing their buying power. The fact is that
the United States dollar is being destroyed deliberately. It is this
process of ruining our money itself that is leading to all the other
chain reactions that are plunging us into depression. This is what I
was talking about in my 1973 book, THE CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE DOLLAR.
And the destructive tampering with America's currency is
continuing--and even speeding up now!

                  Pending HR-7283--$100.00 Bill

   A year and a half ago in AUDIO LETTER No. 63, I revealed a scheme
was being cooked up to do away with our present $100.00 bill. At that
time the plan was still in its infancy. Since then it has continued to
evolve even though the original target date in late 1981 was not met.

   On the first day of last month, October 1982, the stage began to be
set for action in Congress. A Pennsylvania Congressman, Richard
Schulze, introduced a bill which is tailor-made to Treasury Department
specifications. The bill is designated HR-7283, and has the following
long-winded title:

  TO PROVIDE FOR THE RETIREMENT OF ALL UNITED STATES NOTES OF THE
DENOMINATION OF ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00) AND THEIR REPLACEMENT
WITH NEW NOTES OF SUCH DENOMINATION.

   As the title implies, the present version of the scheme embodies
one noticeable difference from that which I reported a year and a half
ago. Originally the plan was to suddenly repudiate the $100.00 bill
altogether. Now the plan is instead to take away the present hundreds
but replace them with new-issue hundreds that look radically
different. This refinement in tactics makes the plan look a little
different, but it will still accomplish all of the original
objectives.

   To see how little the plan has really changed in the past year and
a half, one need only look at the bill now before Congress, HR-7283.

   The original secret plan required that the present $100.00 bill be
declared illegal tender. Likewise, subsection (c) of the bill in
Congress says, quote:

  "Such notes shall cease to be legal tender on a date to be
determined by the Secretary."

   The original secret plan called for holders of $100.00 bills to be
given a brief turn-in period before they became worthless, and now
HR-7283 says in subsection (c), quote:

  "The Secretary shall provide for a ten-day period during which
holders of circulating United States Notes of $100.00 to be retired
may exchange such notes for new-issue notes."

   A key aspect of the original secret plan was that anyone turning in
more than a modest amount of hundreds would become automatic targets
of suspicion. Your name, address, and Social Security number were to
be taken for investigation; and sure enough, here is what HR-7283 now
says in subsection (c), quote:

  "In any case in which any one holder exchanges $100.00 notes in the
value of $5,000.00 or more, a record of the name, address, and Social
Security or federal employee identification number shall be recorded
and forwarded to the Department of the Treasury."

Subsection (d) then says that this information will be provided,
quote:

  "...to federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies for use in
criminal investigation or prosecution."

   The excuses being given for all of this are still following the
secret plan I made public a year and a half ago. In AUDIO LETTER No.
63 I reported that the $100.00 bill ploy would be justified as an
attack on crime and inflation. When Congressman Schulze introduced the
bill on October 1, he followed the Treasury script to the letter. In
his remarks printed that day in the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Schulze
said, quote:

  "The purpose of this bill is to aid law enforcement officials in the
fight against drug trafficking and other crime. A side benefit would
be the reduction in volume of dollars in the underground economy."

But, my friends, the true purposes of the Treasury-inspired $100.00
bill stratagem are far different from those claimed. It is actually a
power play aimed partly at you and me and partly at the enemy of the
Bolsheviks, the Rockefeller cartel! The excuses of attacking crime and
inflation are only a means to an end to close down America.

   To help protect yourself and your family in these very difficult
times, I have outlined what you can do in my book, THE CONSPIRACY
AGAINST THE DOLLAR. It is still good advice today. The main point is
that you have most of your assets abroad in hard currencies, not
dollars; and also you should consider the Currency Hedge Funds in the
Common Market which help you to beat inflation.

   My friends, our money system is being corrupted and destroyed. The
result is a progressive, irreversible disintegration of our economy of
a kind that did not happen in the 30's. We are slipping backward in
the direction of the Dark Ages.

   Honest, stable money is essential to civilization itself. In
primitive cultures there is no money; everything is done by barter.
That works only for very simple societies. The standardized medium of
exchange known as "money" is essential in order to make transactions
more flexible and easy. It opens the way for individuals to specialize
more according to their skills. With specialization comes diversity,
breakthroughs, and advancement of civilization itself. All that starts
coming apart when money becomes a manipulated, unstable, dishonest
commodity.

   The most dramatic and most ominous sign that a society's money is
becoming useless is the reappearance of barter. It means that the
society's normal medium of exchange--money--is not working. Today
barter systems are spreading like wildfire across America; and as it
does, our civilization itself is disintegrating. Our rulers' greed for
power is now leading us all toward a new Dark Ages.

Topic #2--For several years now the nuclear strategy of the United
States has been a first-strike strategy. Top Pentagon military
strategists are preparing actively for nuclear war with Russia, and
they intend for America to strike first.

   It was not always this way; in fact, America's shift onto a first
strike posture is a new development in American history. This is true
even though America's leaders have repeatedly gotten America into war
deliberately. The difference is that in the past America was always
dragged into war by at least appearing to be attacked first. That
enabled American public opinion to be rallied behind the desired war
against the chosen enemy. This approach has always been necessary
because most Americans would never support a war that they knew to be
America's fault.

   America's deliberate involvement in falsely defensive wars began as
long ago as 1898. On February 15 of that year the American battleship
Maine was resting peacefully at anchor in the harbor of Havana, Cuba.
Suddenly a giant explosion rocked the ship and it blew apart. Some 260
American fighting men aboard the ship lost their lives. To the cry of
"Remember the Maine" America went off to war. Afterward overwhelming
evidence was found that the Spaniards had not been responsible for the
Maine disaster; instead, American saboteurs had done the deed in order
to bring on the desired war. But by the time those facts began to
surface quietly, most Americans were not paying attention. We were
just too pleased with ourselves for having crushed Spain and become
suddenly a global power.

   In 1941 America's leaders were spoiling for an even bigger war than
America had ever fought before. The reasons had to do with Saudi
Arabian oil, first and foremost, as I have detailed in the past. The
Rockefeller Standard Oil interests had been locked out of the Persian
Gulf by British boycott tactics. To cure that problem, the Rockefeller
cartel had helped create a threat to Britain in the form of Adolf
Hitler.

   By 1940 the threat was doing its job. The Battle of Britain was
underway, and Churchill was finally willing to come to terms. If the
United States would intervene and stop Hitler, then after the war
America could have the Saudi oil.

   To carry out the bargain, FDR and his Rockefeller sponsors had to
get America into war somehow. But most Americans did not want war; the
only way to change our minds about that was to arrange for America to
be attacked. The Germans were in no position to do that, but Japan
was; and Japan, Germany, and Italy were inseparably linked through the
Tripartite Treaty; so if Japan could be lured into attacking the
United States, we would also be at war with Germany automatically. As
a bonus, this strategy also promised great new gains for the United
States in the Pacific itself. The solution, of course, was Pearl
Harbor.

   When FDR called it a "Day of Infamy", he was right. Roosevelt
himself and other top American leaders were guilty of high treason for
their role in setting up the Pearl Harbor disaster. I have given many
details about this in past AUDIO LETTERS including Nos. 1, 14, 22, and
34. Just in recent months, four decades after the fact, pieces of the
story have started to leak out and become more widely known. For
example, a book was published recently by the Pulitzer Prize-winning
historian John Toland entitled "INFAMY--PEARL HARBOR AND ITS
AFTERMATH." In the book he documents the fact that FDR and his top
military leaders had plenty of advance warning of the attack, and yet
no warning was given to the forces at Pearl Harbor! Why? Because FDR
wanted the Japanese attack to succeed. The deliberate sacrifice of
more than 2,000 American Servicemen's lives was just the right
medicine to cure America's anti-war attitude. To the cries of
"Remember Pearl Harbor", we Americans went off to war to win Saudi oil
for the Rockefeller oil cartel!

   Once again today's rulers of the United States are trying to get
America into another big war; but this time they dare not allow the
enemy, Russia, to strike first as was done at Pearl Harbor by Japan.
America's rulers in 1941 could afford the luxury of throwing away a
big chunk of naval power in the Pearl Harbor attack. There was no
chance that Japan could go on to actually defeat the United States
with its enormous industrial might, but today it's different.

   Today the luxury of time is gone. If the weapons are not ready when
war begins, they cannot be built in time to help; and even more
importantly, the intended enemy today is far more powerful militarily
than the United States! And so today's top Pentagon strategists are
first-strike oriented. In any military campaign, he who strikes the
first blow always has the advantage. If the first blow is also a
surprise, the advantage is tremendous because of all factors of
military strategy, surprise is the most important.

   Just six weeks ago on September 17 the United States came within
hours of actually launching a surprise nuclear first strike against
Russia. It was the culmination of a hurry-up war plan about which I
first began reporting last February in AUDIO LETTER No. 72. The
struggle over this war plan spawned major headlines this year. These
included the Falklands War last spring and the sudden forced
resignation of Secretary of State Alexander Haig last June. The plan
suffered repeated setbacks and yet it stayed on schedule. It was only
during the final two weeks or so that the so-called "PROJECT Z" war
plan finally fell apart too far to proceed. The critical events which
brought this about were a policy change in Red China, Russian military
action in space, and limited public exposure at the last minute. I
detailed all this a month ago in AUDIO LETTER No. 79.

   The war planners here were frustrated this time, my friends, but
they came very close to succeeding. Having come that close, they are
convinced they will succeed on the next attempt, and so they already
have a new war plan underway. Under this new plan, preliminary
preparations and crises are scheduled for about the coming year. Then
in late 1983 they presently expect to begin a new final-crisis
sequence to lead into nuclear war itself in early 1984.

   The new war plan was set in motion on September 14, three days
before the abortive end of "PROJECT Z." The Israeli plan to murder
Lebanese President-elect Bashir Gemayel, which I had made public the
previous month, was carried out. That provided the excuse for the
Israelis to invade Beirut and quickly arrange for a mass murder of
Palestinian civilian refugees. The real pay-off of all this was the
return of American Marines to Beirut in the beginning of a new and
open-ended deployment in Lebanon.

   In AUDIO LETTERS Nos. 78 and 79 I reported that the Marines had
been sent there to become the focus of a major incident. This will
come about under the joint plan of the Bolshevik-controlled United
States Pentagon and the Israeli Mossad. The Mossad is to arrange for a
number of our Marines to be killed in an incident that will be blamed
on the Arabs! This will be used to inflame American public opinion to
help lead us into war, including ultimately nuclear war. It is to be a
replay of the strategy used in 1898 with the battleship Maine.

   Already our psychological conditioning for this planned incident to
come is underway. Just two days ago a car bomb exploded close to a
Marine position in the south of Beirut. There were no serious injuries
this time because there were not meant to be any, but the atmosphere
of danger to our leathernecks is being dramatized. At the same time
the Government is starting to talk about sending in more Marines, many
more, perhaps up to 5,000; and those who are already in Lebanon are
gradually fanning out into more and more dangerous duty areas.

   All of this was set in motion in spite of blunt Russian warnings.
This was accomplished by carrying out theBeirut Massacre; but the
massacre also had a dangerous side effect in the form of world-wide
condemnation of Israel.

   Throughout the latter half of September the reaction to the Beirut
Massacre was building fast, especially among the public of Israel and
America. Within Israel itself, ways were available to maneuver the
protests and keep them from getting out of control. But here in the
United States it was essential to snuff out the reaction to the
massacre very quickly otherwise it could have done real damage to the
Bolshevik-Zionist junta that runs the American and Israeli military
machine. People were beginning to question America's blind support for
Israel's military power.

   In order to blot out the Beirut Massacre from American minds, a
second massacre was perpetrated barely two weeks later. It was the
Tylenol Massacre. The specter of over a thousand rotting bodies in
far-off Beirut were quickly forgotten in the scare over those seven
deaths in Chicago.

   For most Americans, the Tylenol scare just blanked out everything
else. It was an evil masterpiece of psychological trickery. Most of us
find it hard to identify with what happened in Beirut, but we can
certainly identify with a person taking a headache pill. One story had
to do with a lot of foreign people in far-off land; the other had to
do with what was portrayed as a threat to each of us personally.

   As I discussed in my introduction, the Tylenol story stayed on the
front page for a solid month, all through October. Now, finally, there
is starting to be some renewed emphasis of the Beirut tragedy in the
news. We are hearing about eye witnesses to the slaughter who have
contradicted Defense Minister Sharon's claim that the Israelis could
not see the killing. But now the psychological danger point is passed
for the Israelis. It's now "old news" to most people. No matter what
comes out now, it will have almost no chance of interfering with the
ongoing war plans.

   The Reagan Bolsheviks and the Begin Zionists are looking ahead to
next year, but in doing so the Israeli cabinet has suddenly noticed
something that makes their blood run cold. It is right there on the
Hebrew lunar calendar which uses Hebrew letters instead of numbers to
designate the year. For the next Jewish New Year, my friends, those
letters spell the word "doom." The Begin cabinet is reacting to this
discovery as if the finger of God had appeared and written that word
"doom" on the wall of the Knesset--and no wonder, because they have
blood on their hands.

   The present Jewish New Year began with the Beirut Massacre carried
out under the authority of the Begin cabinet, but the militant
Zionists in Israel are reacting as they always react when confronted
with unwelcome facts. They never consider changing their own ways,
instead their solution is, in their own words, "to create new facts."
And that is how they are trying to erase that word "doom" from their
calendar. On October 22 a resolution was passed before the Begin
cabinet to change the designation of the next New Year by rearranging
the letters.

   The American Bolsheviks and their Israeli Zionist allies are
starting a lengthy process of recycling their war plans for another
try. One factor in this new process is Bolshevik intrigue to try to
set off war between India and Pakistan. In AUDIO LETTER No. 78 I
reported that this war was targeted for this month, November 1982, if
"PROJECT Z" did not succeed first.

   The key to war between India and Pakistan is the disputed territory
between them of Kashmir. Kashmir has been held together in relative
stability since 1975 by Sheik Mohammad Abdullah, known as the "Lion of
Kashmir." But about five months ago Abdullah started having a series
of heart attacks. The heart attacks, my friends, were not natural.
Finally two months ago on September 8 he succumbed to one of these
attacks.

   Abdullah's removal from the scene has helped start setting the
stage for the Indo-Pakistani war I warned about in August, but the
Russians know what is afoot and they are advising India's leader,
Indira Gandhi, to defuse the situation. As a result, she invited
Pakistan's General Zia to New Delhi for talks on improving relations.
Zia arrived there two days ago, met with Mrs. Gandhi, and left a group
of diplomats to talk further. Whether all this will prevent the war is
an open question, but at least it should help slow down the Bolshevik
intrigues.

   The process of recycling for another war-try involves many aspects
of the total military picture. For one thing the Bolshevik Pentagon
war planners hope to rebuild some semblance of their secret weapons
reserves. I first reported on their existence and role in the intended
nuclear war in AUDIO LETTER No. 73. These were the real reason for the
Southern Hemisphere war last spring of which the Falklands War was
only the visible part. I can now report that the Bolshevik-controlled
secret naval facilities were not destroyed even though they were put
out of action. A crash program is now underway to repair the damage,
both at South Georgia Island and at the two southern New Zealand
sites. As I reported in AUDIO LETTER No. 74, a portion of the
Bolshevik Stealth Navy escaped altogether from the hostilities.

   Another aspect of the Pentagon's recycling process has to do with
America's newly deployed secret Stealth Planes, called "Phantom War
Planes." These have yet to be tested in combat but they are believed
to be capable of successfully attacking Russia; but due to the sudden
change in China's policies in early September, the crucial Sinkiang
Province launch area is presently unavailable. Should it still be
unavailable a year from now, the Pentagon is determined to have the
next best back-up site ready to go. That back-up site, my friends, is
none other than Kashmir, the disputed area between India and Pakistan.
It is far inferior to Sinkiang Province, China, being nearly twice as
far away from Russia's Cosmosphere bases, but it is still better than
anything else, so don't be surprised if Pakistan goes ahead and
attacks India to seize Kashmir within the next year, talks or no
talks.

                   The Space Shuttle Missions

   And then there is the space shuttle. As I've detailed in past
tapes, the space shuttle is the indispensable key to the Pentagon's
plans to use space for the coming nuclear war. All 4 space shuttle
missions up to now have been military missions, described to the
public as "test flights." Now space shuttle launch #5 is about to take
place, scheduled for November 11, just a few days from now. Now the
alleged test schedule has been used up.

   In order to preserve appearances, there is no choice but to start
following through now with some launches of civilian payloads. That is
what space shuttle #5 now on the pad at Cape Canaveral will be doing.
For the first time there will be no military payload on this shuttle.
For that reason, on this flight we will probably get to see what is
actually happening during the mission.

   Space shuttle #5 will be a "first" in other ways, too. The first
four flights used a skeleton crew of only two astronauts. This time
there are four--Allen, Brand, Overmyer, and Lanoir--three of whom are
civilians.

   But the most important "first" for space shuttle #5 will be one
that is totally unsuspected by the public. My friends, this will be
the first mission to use just one shuttle from start to finish.

   The first four missions used the two-shuttle stratagem which I
first made public in AUDIO LETTER No. 62. Each time we watched a
shuttle with the name "Columbia" on the side take off from Florida.
Once in orbit, the plan called for the astronauts to carry out their
military mission while the public was shown falsified space movies
about the flight. Then the two-man crew was to return to Earth, not
aboard the shuttle itself but aboard a two-man re-entry capsule. The
shuttle itself, if possible, was to return to Earth unmanned, landing
by computer-control in western Australia. Finally, back on Earth, the
two astr onauts boarded a different shuttle with the name "Columbia"
on the side. It was boosted to high speed and then glided to Earth for
the public to watch. But this time it will be different. This time it
is a non-military mission and there are four astronauts, too many to
fit into a re-entry capsule. The shuttle which takes off from Florida
will have to land in California five days later.

   The NASA military shuttle managers believe there will be no trouble
from Russia on this flight. It is purely non-military, and this
shuttle is unarmed; but there is still one major worry. That worry, my
friends, is just this: Will the thermal tiles really work? No one
knows because no space shuttle has ever reentered from orbital
velocity before. All four of the shuttles we have watched blast off
from Florida have been destroyed in space by Russian space weapons
before they could return to Earth, so space shuttle #5 will actually
make the first test of the tiles. NASA believes that the tiles will
hold. If they do, the landing at Edwards Air Force Base on November 16
will look just like the four fake landings we have seen up to now. If
the tiles do not work, four astronauts may pay with their lives for
the NASA deception up to now. Even so, having falsified four allegedly
successful landings, NASA will find a way to explain it away if space
shuttle #5 should end in disaster, because a year from now the space
shuttle will be needed to start preparing for war once again.

Topic #3--On Wednesday October 27 the man known as President Leonid
Brezhnev delivered a speech of major importance in Moscow. The speech
came on the heels of a surprise conference of all Warsaw Pact Foreign
Ministers convened in Moscow just five days earlier. The importance of
the Brezhnev speech was emphasized in every way possible. Brezhnev was
flanked on the podium by his five senior colleagues in the Politburo,
and his audience of more than 500 consisted of the entire upper crust
of the giant Soviet military establishment. Present were all top
Defense Ministry officials, all Soviet Marshals, the Commanders of all
the Russian military services, all regional Soviet Commanders, the
Commanders of Soviet forces abroad, and the top echelon of the Policy
Directorate of the Armed Forces.

   The Brezhnev speech was directed first and foremost to the Military
and to the Russian technological establishment which backs them up,
but it was also directed to the entire Soviet public and was broadcast
in its entirety over nation-wide television.

   In his speech Brezhnev accused the United States of trying to bring
about nuclear war. He said that America's leaders have, quote:

  "...raised the intensity of their military preparations to an
unprecedented level."

And he accused the so-called Reagan Administration of, and I quote
again:

  "...an aggressive policy which is threatening to push the world into
the flames of nuclear war."

   My friends, Government and major media spokesmen always try to lead
us Americans to discount all accusations like that by Russian leaders,
but those harsh words of October 27 in Moscow were not just rhetoric,
far from it. Brezhnev was referring to the Pentagon's "PROJECT Z"
nuclear strike plan which came within hours of execution just six
weeks ago!

   Brezhnev even alluded to the superweapon aspect of the present war
threat. America's radically new Phantom Warplanes are designed to
nullify Russia's ability to stave off an attack with her beam weapons.
Brezhnev assessed the situation in the words:

  "Competition in military technology has sharply intensified, often
acquiring a fundamentally new character."

And he exhorted Russia's technologists to find the solutions to the
threat.

   The Brezhnev speech was most notable for the change of policy which
it revealed. For 18 years now the Brezhnev image has been associated
with detente, but in this speech all that was virtually abandoned,
devalued. Aside from one brief passing reference, no hope was held out
for reviving detente with America's rulers. Instead, the whole thrust
of the speech was that the Russian people must prepare militarily for
the days ahead. It was not a saber-rattling speech directed at
America; it was a call to arms directed to his own people.

   My friends, the significance of this major change in stated policy
can hardly be overstated. It reflects two very important developments.

   One of the developments that led to the Brezhnev speech is the
Kremlin's assessment of the inevitability of NUCLEAR WAR ONE. As I
have reported on past occasions, Russia's new anti-Bolshevik rulers
know their old Bolshevik enemies only too well. Having ousted the
Bolsheviks from control of Russia, the new Kremlin now is confronted
by a Bolshevik-controlled American military. The Russians are
convinced that the Bolsheviks will just keep trying to set off nuclear
war until they finally succeed, and "PROJECT Z" was such a close call
in September that the Russians are not optimistic that they can stop
the next attempt.

   The second development that led to the Brezhnev speech of October
27 is that a changing of the guard is underway in the Kremlin. It's
not a power struggle in the old Bolshevik sense of intrigue and
infighting; instead, it's an orderly succession among a tightly-knit
group of men who are convinced that Russia must prepare for action,
and they want to take advantage of the lull right now while the
Bolsheviks here regroup in the wake of the "PROJECT Z" failure in
September.

   The Russian people are being prepared for the end of the Brezhnev
era in the very near future. For the very first time ever preparations
are underway for a Soviet leader to peacefully and voluntarily retire
with honors. It will be just one more step in the new Kremlin's
gradual step-by-step program of changing the rules of life in Russia.

   In one sense the so-called Brezhnev retirement will only be a
ceremonial fiction; the real Brezhnev died of complications from
Russian flu on January 7, 1978. I first reported his incapacitation
and replacement by a ceremonial "double" in AUDIO LETTER No. 30.
Later, in AUDIO LETTER No. 33, I was able to report the date of his
death. Since that time several doubles have been employed to maintain
the Brezhnev image until the time was ripe for change. That time, my
friends, has now arrived.

   During the interim since the real Brezhnev's death, a succession of
several men have held the reins of top power in Russia. First there
was Defense Minister Ustinov, leader of the "White Doves." Then it was
the head of the Soviet Navy, Admiral Gorshkov. Next, power was shared
among several men, but none of these men could truly fill the shoes of
the departed Brezhnev, and the search for more effective leadership
has continued. Now, my friends, that search is at an end.

   The new ruler of Russia is already taking the reins of power right
now. It may be some time yet before his true role becomes publicly
visible, but his mark is already being stamped on Russian policies. It
was he more than anyone else who was the architect of the startling
Brezhnev speech, so called, of October 27. Russia's new top ruler
spent 15 years as head of Russia's world-wide Intelligence service,
the KGB. When he took charge in 1967 his task was to transform the KGB
by rooting out all Bolshevik power over it. His success in doing so
helped set the stage for the final  overthrow of the Bolsheviks from
Kremlin power in 1976 and 1977. Now he has been chosen to become the
top leader of the Soviet Union. The name of Russia's new leader is
Yuri Andropov. Right now that name may be unfamiliar to you, but I
urge you to start watching for it in the news. Directly or indirectly
we will be hearing more and more from Andropov from this time forward.

                       LAST MINUTE SUMMARY

   Now it's time for my Last Minute Summary. In this AUDIO LETTER I've
tried to give you some perspective on the probable direction of events
over the next year or so.

   The Bolsheviks here failed to set off their nuclear war plan in
September so now they are recycling for another try in a year o r so.
Meanwhile they are turning inward to tighten their grip on America
itself through economic means. At the same time the Russians, too, are
taking advantage  of this breather for a changing of the guard in the
Kremlin. They are preparing for action with a new strong leader at the
helm.

   Here in America the destruction of our currency is continuing with
the $100.00 bill now targeted for special attack. By this economic
route the civilization of America itself is being undermined. Over the
course of generations we Americans have been lured to worship the
so-called "almighty dollar", so we have come under the spell of those
who have made the dollar corrupt as a tool of power.

   In the last analysis, the most basic cause of our deepening
economic crisis is something our Lord Jesus Christ tried to warn us
about long ago. He said we cannot serve two masters, both God and
mammon--either we will love one or we will cling to the other. Today
America as a whole is clinging to mammon and forgetting God! If that
does not change, my friends, the ages ahead will be dark indeed.

   Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and
may God bless each and every one of you.
------------------------------------------------
(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the
Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.

 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.

 E-mail [e-mail])
Other sites are invited to mirror these files, with attribution to RFM.